Beskos

Comparisons

openDesk alternative

openDesk is the German public sector's sovereign workspace: open-source components — Open-Xchange, Nextcloud, Collabora, XWiki, Element, Jitsi — assembled into one suite. It is software, and somebody has to run it.

There is no list price to compare

Neither side has a list price: openDesk is software, and so is Beskos. What each costs depends on who hosts it, on how many servers and with which support contract. Inventing a number for either would be dishonest, so the comparison here is one of scope and operation.

What each one covers

 openDeskBeskos
Mail on your own domain Included Included
Calendar and invites Included Included
Contacts with custom fieldsLimited Included
Team files Included Included
Chat with channels and threads Included Included
Video meetings with recording Included Included
Edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint Included Included
Wiki / knowledge base Included Included
Kanban boards Included Included
AI assistant includedNot available Included
Desktop folder sync Included Included
Own domain with DKIM and DMARC Included Included
Source you can read Included Included
Run it on your own server Included Included
Data in the European Union Included Included
Provider subject to EU law Included Included
Managed service, nothing to hostLimitedNot available
All in the same appLimited Included

Where openDesk is better

  • Its components carry classic open-source licences, with no commercial restriction. Beskos is source-available under the Business Source Licence, which reserves the right to offer it as a service — a real difference, and in openDesk's favour.
  • It can be bought already operated, from providers who run it for you. Our own hosted service is announced and not open.
  • Developed under the German federal administration, which is a reference no start-up can match.
  • Backed by an institution rather than a company, with the durability that implies.

Where Beskos wins

  • One product rather than six open-source projects federated behind a portal, with the consistency that follows: one account, one permission model, one search.
  • An AI assistant included and grounded in your own data, which openDesk does not provide.
  • One compose file to install rather than an integration between components to maintain.

In short

Openness is not the difference here: both are open source and both run on your own servers. openDesk assembles six established projects behind one portal, with an institution behind it; Beskos is one product built as a whole, with an assistant, and is far younger. If the deciding factor is an institutional reference, openDesk has it. If it is coherence across the apps, that is what Beskos is for.

Read it before you believe any of this

Every row above is a claim about software you can download. The code is public, so the table can be checked rather than trusted.